Re: [HACKERS] Change in "policy" on dump ordering? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Change in "policy" on dump ordering?
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoZZXEHpz_pKOSfArkWpU6WDd55NoV8=1-sNiZxY1kqMzQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Change in "policy" on dump ordering?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Change in "policy" on dump ordering?
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 2:41 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> The bigger issue is whether there's some failure case this would cause
> that I'm missing altogether.  Thoughts?

I think dependencies are fundamentally the right model for this sort
of problem.  I can't imagine what could go wrong that wouldn't amount
to a failure to insert all of the right dependencies, and thus be
fixable by inserting whatever was missing.

It's possible I am lacking in imagination, so take that opinion for
what it's worth.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] pl/perl extension fails on Windows
Next
From: Mark Rofail
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] GSoC 2017: Foreign Key Arrays