On Sat, Sep 27, 2025 at 12:43 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> I tried it on my Mac M4 laptop, and saw the 002 test dropping from
> 3592 ms to 540 ms, about an 85% savings. So I agree this is worth
> doing. It's still unclear why Robert is seeing times so much worse
> than mine, though.
I don't have a clear explanation for that slowness either, but the
patch cuts down the runtime by 89% on my machine.
(I have not looked at the code.)
--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com