On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 9:26 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> Yes, I think that's probably a net improvement in robustness quite
> apart from what we decide to do about any of the rest of this. I've
> attached it here as revise-procglobal-tracking.patch and will commit
> that bit if nobody objects. The remainder is reattached without
> change as group-locking-v0.1.patch.
>
> Per your other comment, I've developed the beginnings of a testing
> framework which I attached here as test_group_locking-v0.patch.
Urk. I attached a version with some stupid bugs. Here's a slightly better one.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
