On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 4:52 PM, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> wrote:
> My proposal is that instead of looking at three hundred lines, you'd
> look for 50 lines of `pg_restore -l` output -- is element XYZ in there
> or not. Quite a bit simpler for the guy adding a new test. This tests
> combinations of pg_dump switches: are we dumping the right set of
> objects.
My counter-proposal is that we remove the test entirely. It looks
like an unmaintainable and undocumented mess to me, and I doubt
whether the testing value is sufficient to justify the effort of
updating it every time anyone wants to change something in pg_dump.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
