Re: New vacuum option to do only freezing - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: New vacuum option to do only freezing
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoZU_qfkL0Wn2aZL9yuewFARXutXwAyCw0D9HxWL5PEsqw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: New vacuum option to do only freezing  (Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: New vacuum option to do only freezing  (Greg Stark <stark@mit.edu>)
Re: New vacuum option to do only freezing  (Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Nov 5, 2018 at 3:12 AM Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote:
> Adding a field-and-value style option might be worth. Or maybe we can
> add one option for example freeze_without_index_cleanup?

That seems non-orthogonal.  We have an existing flag to force freezing
(FREEZE); we don't need a second option that does the same thing.
Skipping the index scans (and thus necessarily the second heap pass)
is a separate behavior which we don't currently have a way to control.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: pread() and pwrite()
Next
From: Pavel Stehule
Date:
Subject: Re: bugfix: BUG #15477: Procedure call with named inout refcursorparameter - "invalid input syntax for type boolean"