Re: The plan for FDW-based sharding - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: The plan for FDW-based sharding
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoZTuKsdx1tvn+zTGYAj=PiJ92MSOjZa+wbFwkDpzAbPJg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: The plan for FDW-based sharding  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 10:00 PM, Joshua D. Drake <jd@commandprompt.com> wrote:
> Robert, this is all a game. It is a game of who wins the intellectual prize
> to whatever problem. Who gets the market or mind share and who gets to
> pretend they win the Oscar for coolest design.

JD, I don't have a horse in this race.  I am not developing a GTM and
I would be quite happy never to have to develop a GTM.  That doesn't
mean I think we should add these proposed hooks.  I think that's just
freezing the way that potential GTMs have to interact with the rest of
the system before we actually have a solution that the community is
willing to endorse.  I don't know what problem that solves.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Gabe F. Rudy"
Date:
Subject: Re: FDW handling count(*) through AnalyzeForeignTable or other constant time push-down
Next
From: Konstantin Knizhnik
Date:
Subject: Re: The plan for FDW-based sharding