Re: Granting control of SUSET gucs to non-superusers - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: Granting control of SUSET gucs to non-superusers
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoZSLRN=wkyZfng60QwcyRjzWm6cZRQPw2F+qDupBDGGvA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Granting control of SUSET gucs to non-superusers  (Chapman Flack <chap@anastigmatix.net>)
Responses Re: Granting control of SUSET gucs to non-superusers  (Chapman Flack <chap@anastigmatix.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, May 3, 2021 at 11:45 AM Chapman Flack <chap@anastigmatix.net> wrote:
> I guess I was thinking, but forgot to convey to the keyboard, that the
> existence of a non-empty extra_check_hooks chain on a SUSET GUC (which
> could only have been attached from a shared preload library) would
> implicitly change SUSET to mean settable whenever accepted by the hook(s).

Sure, but the hook still needs a way to know which users are entitled
to set the GUC.

-- 
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Matthias van de Meent
Date:
Subject: Re: MaxOffsetNumber for Table AMs
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Granting control of SUSET gucs to non-superusers