Re: Rethinking the parameter access hooks for plpgsql's benefit - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: Rethinking the parameter access hooks for plpgsql's benefit
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoZPNJmP7u_ZB3y33nDqgJrekTfVG6CdtnGvSmfoxHZc-g@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Rethinking the parameter access hooks for plpgsql's benefit  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
Responses Re: Rethinking the parameter access hooks for plpgsql's benefit  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 12:26 PM, Joshua D. Drake <jd@commandprompt.com> wrote:
> From the reading the original post it seems like the patch was developed on
> Sales Force's time, not TGLs. I do not think we get to have an opinion on
> that.

Salesforce gets to develop their patches whenever they want, but they
don't get to control the community process for getting those patches
committed to PostgreSQL.

> Thank you Tom for the efforts you made here, making the largest used PL
> better, faster, stronger is exactly the type of micro-changes we need to be
> looking at for further polish within the database.

So, just to be clear, are you proposing that everybody is exempted
from the CommitFest deadlines, or just Tom?

Thanks,

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Joshua D. Drake"
Date:
Subject: Re: Rethinking the parameter access hooks for plpgsql's benefit
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: Bootstrap DATA is a pita