Re: Parallel Seq Scan - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: Parallel Seq Scan
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoZOe0v6j8NgTFe48oFMx2LYjWJN=_f8e_QLEa7CEM2HVQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Parallel Seq Scan  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Parallel Seq Scan
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 7:01 AM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
> I think this can happen if funnel->nextqueue is greater than
> funnel->nqueues.
> Please see if attached patch fixes the issue, else could you share the
> scenario in more detail where you hit this issue.

Speaking as the guy who wrote the first version of that code...

I don't think this is the right fix; the point of that code is to
remove a tuple queue from the funnel when it gets detached, which is a
correct thing to want to do.  funnel->nextqueue should always be less
than funnel->nqueues; how is that failing to be the case here?

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Parallel Seq Scan
Next
From: Stephen Frost
Date:
Subject: Re: CATUPDATE confusion?