Re: PostgreSQL 9.3 beta breaks some extensions "make install" - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: PostgreSQL 9.3 beta breaks some extensions "make install"
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoZNh+YwAm7cdoheij5ehr22Yfjch9F0a91a-Jdd_71UKw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PostgreSQL 9.3 beta breaks some extensions "make install"  (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 10:30 PM, Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net> wrote:
> * Tom Lane (tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote:
>> I still think we should revert 9db7ccae2000524b72a4052352cbb5407fb53b02.
>> The argument that the system-provided program might be faster carries
>> very little weight for me --- "make install" is fast enough already.
>> It's not worth making a bunch of extension authors jump through hoops,
>> whether their style was bad or not.
>
> +1.

+1.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Amit Langote
Date:
Subject: Re: Logging of PAM Authentication Failure
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: postgres_fdw foreign tables and serial columns