Re: trying again to get incremental backup - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: trying again to get incremental backup
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoZNVeBzoqDL8xvr-nkaepq815jtDR4nJzPew7=3iEuM1g@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: trying again to get incremental backup  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: trying again to get incremental backup
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Oct 4, 2023 at 4:08 PM Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> Clearly there's a good amount of stuff to sort out here, but we've
> still got quite a bit of time left before feature freeze so I'd like
> to have a go at it. Please let me know your thoughts, if you have any.

Apparently, nobody has any thoughts, but here's an updated patch set
anyway. The main change, other than rebasing, is that I did a bunch
more documentation work on the main patch (0005). I'm much happier
with it now, although I expect it may need more adjustments here and
there as outstanding design questions get settled.

After some thought, I think that it should be fine to commit 0001 and
0002 as independent refactoring patches, and I plan to go ahead and do
that pretty soon unless somebody objects.

Thanks,

--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Laurenz Albe
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add support function for containment operators
Next
From: shihao zhong
Date:
Subject: Re: Allow ALTER SYSTEM SET on unrecognized custom GUCs