Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: Avoiding pin scan during btree vacuum - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: Avoiding pin scan during btree vacuum
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoZMn2F5ETHyY-1NMvrO0i50H_62xohn0UD1Y37OpLepeg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Avoiding pin scan during btree vacuum  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Avoiding pin scan during btree vacuum  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On Mon, Jan 4, 2016 at 10:30 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> This seems like a might subtle thing to backpatch. If we really want to
>> go there, ISTM that the relevant code should stew in an unreleased
>> branch for a while, before being backpatched.
>
> I'm definitely -1 on back-patching such a thing.  Put it in HEAD for
> awhile.  If it survives six months or so then we could discuss it again.

I agree with Tom.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Some 9.5beta2 backend processes not terminating properly?
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: Some 9.5beta2 backend processes not terminating properly?