Re: cleanup patches for incremental backup - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: cleanup patches for incremental backup
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoZLXsorAX2XNxC1+zKFSagCZUk4Qiq49+WxTk8oePvWCQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: cleanup patches for incremental backup  (Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: cleanup patches for incremental backup
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Jan 25, 2024 at 11:08 AM Nathan Bossart
<nathandbossart@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 25, 2024 at 10:06:41AM -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 24, 2024 at 2:39 PM Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> That seems like a reasonable starting point.  Even if it doesn't help
> >> determine the root cause, it should at least help rule out concurrent
> >> summary removal.
> >
> > Here is a patch for that.
>
> LGTM.  The only thing I might add is the cutoff_time in that LOG.

Here is v2 with that addition.

--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: MERGE ... WHEN NOT MATCHED BY SOURCE
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: Add SPLIT PARTITION/MERGE PARTITIONS commands