Re: REPACK and naming - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: REPACK and naming
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoZHpNPftfzn=9s-pmKwzEQDNB1Brit-GBY+GP2r=X+7Nw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: REPACK and naming  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: REPACK and naming
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Sep 17, 2025 at 10:22 AM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> By and large, I don't think I like this renaming proposal.
> Maybe eventually it would reduce confusion, but there will be
> a long interval where it adds more.

I mean, it's PRETTY confusing that VACUUM FULL does something much
more similar to CLUSTER than it is to VACUUM. We can't ever get out
from under that confusion if we don't change something. I think it's
more than fair to bikeshed what the verb should be that describes the
action we currently describe by writing either VACUUM FULL or CLUSTER,
but I agree with Álvaro that having one verb for both of those things
makes a lot more sense than the status quo.

--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Greg Burd
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add tests for Bitmapset
Next
From: Álvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: REPACK and naming