On Fri, Jan 5, 2024 at 4:36 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> I don't think I believe this code change, let alone any of the
> explanations for it. The point of these Asserts is to be sure that
> we don't form an alleged parameterization set that includes any rels
> that are included in the new join, because that would be obviously
> wrong. They do check that as they stand. I'm not sure what invariant
> the proposed revision would be enforcing.
Well, this explanation made sense to me:
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAMbWs4-%2BGs0HJ9ouBUb%3DqwHsGCXxG%2B92eJzLOpCkedvgtOWQ%3DQ%40mail.gmail.com
--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com