On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 11:39 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
>> There is a long-running thread on pgsql-hackers on whether 9.6 should
>> instead be called 10.0.
>
> First I've seen it mentioned here.
>
> I think you are just about exactly one week too late to bring this up.
> Once we've shipped a beta, rebranding is way too confusing.
So, not that it makes any difference at this point, but this seems to
fly in the face of what you said before.
http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/24567.1456864829@sss.pgh.pa.us
Unless you thought that beta wasn't going to be out until the fall.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
