On Sat, Dec 16, 2017 at 11:42 PM, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
>> I'm not sure we should regard very quick bloating as a problem in need
>> of solving. Doesn't that just mean we need the cache to be bigger, at
>> least temporarily?
>
> Leaving that aside, is that actually not at least to a good degree,
> solved by that problem? By bumping the generation on hash resize, we
> have recency information we can take into account.
I agree that we can do it. I'm just not totally sure it's a good
idea. I'm also not totally sure it's a bad idea, either. That's why
I asked the question.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
