Re: Additional LWLOCK_STATS statistics - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: Additional LWLOCK_STATS statistics
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoZDsBZpSzpgLDbEC9scapoL0TwetPk8QuK=Rs5cLM4eKg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Additional LWLOCK_STATS statistics  (Jesper Pedersen <jesper.pedersen@redhat.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 10:13 AM, Jesper Pedersen
<jesper.pedersen@redhat.com> wrote:
> Doing block_time / block_count basically only shows "main 0" -- its called
> "unassigned:0"; it also shows up in the max exclusive report. Where it is
> coming from is another question, since it shouldn't be in use.

LWLOCK_STATS itself uses that for something, I think.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: Reliance on undefined behaviour in << operator
Next
From: Christoph Berg
Date:
Subject: Building storage/lwlocknames.h?