Re: [HACKERS] Parallel seq. plan is not coming against inheritance orpartition table - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Parallel seq. plan is not coming against inheritance orpartition table
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoZDmTFZu4iZgX43vJU8WCUnd9L9TU8Bavdi0W_0iGN8UQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Parallel seq. plan is not coming against inheritance orpartition table  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 10:18 AM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
> Agreed, so I have rebased your patch and passed heap_pages as -1 for
> index_only scans as discussed.   Also, Rafia has tested with attached
> patch that parallel index and parallel index only scans are picked for
> TPC-H queries.  I have also reviewed and tested your changes with
> respect to problem reported and found that it works as expected.  So,
> I think we can go ahead with attached patch unless you see some
> problem with the changes I have made.

OK, committed with a little more wordsmithing.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Petr Jelinek
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] logical replication access control patches
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] logical replication access control patches