Re: making relfilenodes 56 bits - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: making relfilenodes 56 bits
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoZCstmXpGFQaLMdf-WgiCrFW+F7Cks1_wJCKZhf9TCTZw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: making relfilenodes 56 bits  (Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Sep 27, 2022 at 2:33 AM Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com> wrote:
> Looks fine to me.

OK, committed. I also committed the 0002 patch with some wordsmithing,
and I removed a < 0 test an an unsigned value because my compiler
complained about it. 0001 turned out to make headerscheck sad, so I
just pushed a fix for that, too.

I'm not too sure about 0003. I think if we need an is_shared flag
maybe we might as well just pass the tablespace OID. The is_shared
flag seems to just make things a bit complicated for the callers for
no real benefit.

-- 
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Ashwin Agrawal
Date:
Subject: Re: Backends stalled in 'startup' state
Next
From: Melanie Plageman
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_stat_bgwriter.buffers_backend is pretty meaningless (and more?)