Re: Regarding Checkpoint Redo Record - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: Regarding Checkpoint Redo Record
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoZC=oijDYkWtg3dBX+ZcXFy-Wfeu3QDD8rJbpkJ71TRtA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Regarding Checkpoint Redo Record  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 4:06 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
>> But, the OP makes me wonder: why can a standby only perform a
>> restartpoint where the master performed a checkpoint?  It seems like a
>> standby ought to be able to create a restartpoint anywhere, just by
>> writing everything, flushing it to disk, and update pg_control.
>
> Perhaps, but then crash restarts would have to accept start pointers
> that point at any random place in the WAL.  I like the additional error
> checking of verifying that there's a checkpoint recod there.

I could go either way on that one, but...

> Also
> I think the full-page-write mechanism would no longer protect against
> torn pages during replay if you did that.

...this is a very good point.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: 16-bit page checksums for 9.2
Next
From: Jim Nasby
Date:
Subject: Re: Page Checksums + Double Writes