Re: [HACKERS] Update low-level backup documentation to match actual behavior - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Update low-level backup documentation to match actual behavior
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoZ8Pu6tvSk0TmyzZZUdCVtJuqDR25FEoxJfJF1=yo0sMw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Update low-level backup documentation to match actual behavior  (David Steele <david@pgmasters.net>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Update low-level backup documentation to match actual behavior  (David Steele <david@pgmasters.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 2:58 PM, David Steele <david@pgmasters.net> wrote:
> OK, but I was trying to make it very clear that this backup method only
> works on a primary.  If you think the text is in the first paragraph is
> enough then I'm willing to go with that, though.

Yeah, I think the text is enough.

> Since the exclusive method only works on a primary...

Oh, right.  Duh.

If you update the patch I'll apply it to 11 and 10.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: David Steele
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Update low-level backup documentation to match actual behavior
Next
From: Vesa-Matti J Kari
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] HISTIGNORE for psql