Re: [HACKERS] Log LDAP "diagnostic messages"? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Log LDAP "diagnostic messages"?
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoZ8Bv83_ZVc9hbPOJOukcRqWRF46eADuDtcz6U82gBVyA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Log LDAP "diagnostic messages"?  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Log LDAP "diagnostic messages"?  (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 10:21 AM, Alvaro Herrera
<alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> wrote:
> BTW I added --with-ldap and --with-pam to the configure line for the
> reports in coverage.postgresql.org and the % covered in auth.c went from
> 24% to 18.9% (from very bad to terribly sad).

Improved code coverage is becoming a fad.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] expanding inheritance in partition bound order
Next
From: Jesper Pedersen
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [POC] hash partitioning