On Tue, Jul 14, 2026 at 7:31 AM Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se> wrote:
> A more likely scenario is that you are hacking in this code and have made silly
> errors. It mostly seemed consistent with how the forknum error is reported,
> but is not important.
Upon reflection, it occurred to me that I would probably rather have
the chunk offset than the chunk size if this ever trips, so I added
both to the error message. Here's v2.
> No disagreement there, which is why I tried to get it reviewed quickly so it
> can be applied and forgotten about and we can move on to more important
> matters.
Thanks for reviewing.
--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com