Re: commitfest 2016-11 status summary - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: commitfest 2016-11 status summary
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoZ6Pf8Em5Hza5nMUuhjQe7xyEEe5kkrUndoke8jr8PWHw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: commitfest 2016-11 status summary  (Haribabu Kommi <kommi.haribabu@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: commitfest 2016-11 status summary  (Jim Nasby <Jim.Nasby@BlueTreble.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 12:50 AM, Haribabu Kommi
<kommi.haribabu@gmail.com> wrote:
> Moved to next CF with needs review.
> 1. patch doesn't receive any full review in the commitfest
> 2. Patch received feedback at the end of commitfest.

The number of patches that got this treatment seems quite large.  If
the people who are submitting patches are also reviewing other patches
of comparable difficulty, this really shouldn't be happening.
Something isn't working well, here.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Typmod associated with multi-row VALUES constructs
Next
From: "David G. Johnston"
Date:
Subject: Re: Typmod associated with multi-row VALUES constructs