Re: Bug in batch tuplesort memory CLUSTER case (9.6 only) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: Bug in batch tuplesort memory CLUSTER case (9.6 only)
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoZ40wc6yqZn0hs8ULQ6SgoyhKrQv1=F26HYiDHQAcC6Rw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Bug in batch tuplesort memory CLUSTER case (9.6 only)  (Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>)
Responses Re: Bug in batch tuplesort memory CLUSTER case (9.6 only)  (Peter Geoghegan <pg@heroku.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 3:34 AM, Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com> wrote:
>> Are you satisfied that I have adequately described steps to reproduce?
>
> I can confirm that (after 62 minutes) your test procedure reached SIGSEGV
> today and then completed successfully with your patch.

Thanks for testing.  I've committed this patch, breaking off one
unrelated bit of into a separate commit.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Pete Stevenson
Date:
Subject: MVCC overheads
Next
From: Julien Rouhaud
Date:
Subject: Issue with bgworker, SPI and pgstat_report_stat