Re: [HACKERS] Block level parallel vacuum - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Block level parallel vacuum
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoZ3_drV0Tv+DDRNYG04g+izrrhVvhRJDKBAJxj40aF7Xg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Block level parallel vacuum  (Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Block level parallel vacuum
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Mar 6, 2019 at 1:26 AM Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote:
> Okay, attached the latest version of patch set. I've incorporated all
> comments I got and separated the patch for making vacuum options a
> Node (0001 patch). And the patch doesn't use parallel_workers. It
> might be proposed in the another form again in the future if
> requested.

Why make it a Node?  I mean I think a struct makes sense, but what's
the point of giving it a NodeTag?

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: Server Crash in logical decoding if used inside --single mode
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: patch to allow disable of WAL recycling