Re: Proposal: Global Index - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: Proposal: Global Index
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoZ2-BR79xXpY2JTe++B0XNuFvveDA_BUJjKdZcLYD33iA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Proposal: Global Index  (曾文旌 <wenjing.zwj@alibaba-inc.com>)
Responses Re: Proposal: Global Index  (曾文旌 <wenjing.zwj@alibaba-inc.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Jan 7, 2021 at 4:44 AM 曾文旌 <wenjing.zwj@alibaba-inc.com> wrote:
> I've been following this topic for a long time. It's been a year since the last response.
> It was clear that our customers wanted this feature as well, and a large number of them mentioned it.
>
> So, I wish the whole feature to mature as soon as possible.
> I summarized the scheme mentioned in the email and completed the POC patch(base on PG_13).

You need to summarize the basic design choices you've made here. Like,
what did you do about the fact that TIDs have to be 6 bytes?

--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Key management with tests
Next
From: Magnus Hagander
Date:
Subject: Re: Online checksums patch - once again