Re: Connection slots reserved for replication - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: Connection slots reserved for replication
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoZ0jOYMg7KVBQuj2DbJuujbEbysY13zFSo7PVGbYX3X6g@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Connection slots reserved for replication  (Alexander Kukushkin <cyberdemn@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Jan 2, 2019 at 6:36 AM Alexander Kukushkin <cyberdemn@gmail.com> wrote:
> I was also thinking about changing the value in PG_CONTROL_VERSION,
> because we added the new field into the control file, but decided to
> leave this change to committer.

We typically omit catversion bumps from submitted patches to avoid
unnecessary conflicts, but I think PG_CONTROL_VERSION doesn't change
enough to cause a problem.  Also, it's not date-dependent the way
catversion is.  So I would include the bump in the patch, if it were
me.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Libpq support to connect to standby server as priority
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: New vacuum option to do only freezing