Re: Support a wildcard in backtrace_functions - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: Support a wildcard in backtrace_functions
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoZ032j_dRYvsmxvG=faxtFsGC7-gaptrj_28YaQMa_TiA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Support a wildcard in backtrace_functions  (Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>)
Responses Re: Support a wildcard in backtrace_functions
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Apr 29, 2024 at 5:12 AM Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org> wrote:
> On 27.04.24 00:16, Michael Paquier wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 26, 2024 at 02:39:16PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> Well, in that case we have to have some kind of control GUC, and
> >> I think the consensus is that the one we have now is under-designed.
> >> So I also vote for a full revert and try again in v18.
> >
> > Okay, fine by me to move on with a revert.
>
> Ok, it's reverted.

Thanks, and sorry. :-(

--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: Direct SSL connection with ALPN and HBA rules
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: Tarball builds in the new world order