Re: Issue with NULLS LAST, with postgres_fdw sort pushdown - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: Issue with NULLS LAST, with postgres_fdw sort pushdown
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoZ-YCSjOHMN3RHfrygkW_k-CKo1gq_OA+uPLchxy2C6jw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Issue with NULLS LAST, with postgres_fdw sort pushdown  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 12:08 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat@enterprisedb.com> writes:
>> On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 7:27 AM, Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>> Per explain.c, this looks inconsistent to me. Shouldn't NULLS LAST be
>>> applied only if DESC is used in this ORDER BY clause?
>
>> ... In this case we are constructing a query to be
>> sent to the foreign server and it's better not to leave the defaults to be
>> interpreted by the foreign server; in case it interprets them in different
>> fashion. get_rule_orderby() also explicitly adds these options.
>
> Yeah, I agree that we don't need to go out of our way to make the query
> succinct here.  Explicitness is easier and safer too, so why not?

+1.  So, committed Ashutosh's version.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Relation extension scalability
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: GetExistingLocalJoinPath() vs. the docs