On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 12:11 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
>> On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 11:54 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>>> http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc3629.html
>
>> I'm still confused. The input string is already known to be valid
>> UTF-8, so the second byte (if there is one) must be between 0x80 and
>> 0xBF. Therefore it will be neither 0xED nor 0xF4.
>
> I haven't read the patch lately, but ED and F4 are special as *first*
> bytes. Maybe the logic isn't quite right, or you read it wrong?
I think I'll let the patch author comment on that. It looks wrong to
me, but I just work here.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
