Re: [HACKERS] Some thoughts about SCRAM implementation - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Some thoughts about SCRAM implementation
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoYzeCkQ4wucECPiioi4DTjaVkpUU=CoZMLpWu9q2chsGQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Some thoughts about SCRAM implementation  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 2:32 PM, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
> That can equally be said about about a lot of features.  If we don't
> stop at some point... Also, we're not late in the CF cycle, the CF cycle
> for v10 is over.  It's not like the non-existance of channel binding
> removes previously existing features, or makes SCRAM useless.

+1.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] strange parallel query behavior after OOM crashes
Next
From: Markus Nullmeier
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] "left shift of negative value" warnings