On Wed, Nov 7, 2018 at 1:14 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> I think that having superusers be immune to datconnlimit is actually
> the right thing; for one reason, because datconnlimit can be set by
> database owners, who should not be able to lock superusers out of
> their database.
Yeah, that's a reasonable argument, although they'd also be locking
themselves out of the database, and the superuser could undo it by
connecting to some other database.
> If people are okay with having rolconnlimit act
> differently from datconnlimit in this respect, then I'll withdraw
> my objection.
Is there any particular reason why they should be consistent? It's
not obvious to me, but sometimes I'm dumb.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
