On Fri, Sep 15, 2023 at 7:47 AM Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi> wrote:
> Thinking about this some more, I think this is still not 100% correct,
> even with the patch I posted earlier:
This is marked as needing review, but that doesn't appear to be
correct, because there's this comment, indicating that the patch
requires re-work, and there's also two emails from Noah on the thread
providing further feedback. So it seems this has been waiting for
Heikki or someone else to have time to work it for the last 3 months.
Hence, marking RwF for now; if someone gets back to it, please reopen.
--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com