On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 4:11 PM, Andreas Seltenreich <seltenreich@gmx.de> wrote:
>> Amit Kapila writes:
>>> Sounds good. So can we assume that you will try to get us the new report
>>> with more information?
>
> I don't see these crashes anymore in c1543a8. By the amount of fuzzing
> done it should have happened a dozen times, so it's highly likely
> something in 23b09e15..c1543a8 fixed it.
Hmm, I'd guess c45bf5751b6338488bd79ce777210285531da373 to be the most
likely candidate.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
