On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 3:03 AM, David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
>> > Well. Unless I miss something it doesn't resolve the problem that
>> > started this thread. Namely that it's currently impossible to write
>> > regression using EXPLAIN (ANALYZE, TIMING OFF. COSTS OFF). Which is
>> > worthwhile because it allows to tests some behaviour that's only visible
>> > in actually executed plans (like seing that a subtree wasn't executed).
>>
>> TBH, I don't particularly care about that. A new flag for turning
>> "summary timing" off would answer the complaint with not too much
>> non-orthogonality ... but I really don't find this use case compelling
>> enough to justify adding a feature to EXPLAIN.
>>
> Hmm, was my case above not compelling enough?
Apparently not to Tom, but it made sense to me. I think we should
find a way to do something about this - maybe making TIMING OFF also
suppress that info is the simplest approach.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
