On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 11:30 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> I'd be in favor of having some normally-ifdef'd-out facility for causing
> failures of this kind. (As I mentioned upthread, I do not think "always
> fail" is sufficient.) That's very different from having a user-visible
> option, though. We don't expose a GUC that enables CLOBBER_FREED_MEMORY,
> to take a relevant example.
Sure. Feel free to propose something you like.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
