Re: Documentation fixes for pg_visibility - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: Documentation fixes for pg_visibility
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoYvroXPe2YMAvL_wOs4uuBwG=G2ZO6+1f-ZbFEfOMNdwQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Documentation fixes for pg_visibility  (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 12:46 AM, Michael Paquier
<michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 1:42 PM, Michael Paquier
> <michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote:
>> While looking at the module I found two mistakes in the docs:
>> pg_visibility_map and pg_visibility *not* taking in input a block
>> number are SRFs, and return a set of records. The documentation is
>> just listing them with "returns record". A patch is attached.
>
> And that: s/PD_ALL_VISIBILE/PD_ALL_VISIBLE.

Committed.  Thanks for the careful proofreading.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: Documentation fixes for pg_visibility
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: fixing consider_parallel for upper planner rels