Re: [HACKERS] Another oddity in handling of WCO constraints in postgres_fdw - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Another oddity in handling of WCO constraints in postgres_fdw
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoYvaTKzt9K_DyXVQCtEFpLsTqAAuBte_MTPib4zae_xdA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Another oddity in handling of WCO constraints in postgres_fdw  (Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat@enterprisedb.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Another oddity in handling of WCO constraints in postgres_fdw  (Etsuro Fujita <fujita.etsuro@lab.ntt.co.jp>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Oct 4, 2017 at 5:58 PM, Ashutosh Bapat
<ashutosh.bapat@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> The view with WCO is local but the modification which violates WCO is
> being made on remote server by a trigger on remote table. Trying to
> control that doesn't seem to be a good idea, just like we can't
> control what rows get inserted on the foreign server when they violate
> local constraints.

I think that's a fair point.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Geoghegan
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Parallel tuplesort (for parallel B-Tree index creation)
Next
From: Craig Ringer
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] PATCH: enabling parallel execution for cursorsexplicitly (experimental)