Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: Fwd: Cluster "stuck" in "not accepting commands to avoid wraparound data loss" - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: Fwd: Cluster "stuck" in "not accepting commands to avoid wraparound data loss"
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoYuCJQNEYS2oOZrqtYX1AzfZisdhy-GA0g47-CSZz8vgw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Fwd: Cluster "stuck" in "not accepting commands to avoid wraparound data loss"  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Responses Re: Fwd: Cluster "stuck" in "not accepting commands to avoid wraparound data loss"  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 12:14 PM, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
> On 2015-12-17 09:04:25 -0800, Jeff Janes wrote:
>> > But I'm somewhat confused what this has to do with Andres's report.
>>
>> Doesn't it explain the exact situation he is in, where the oldest
>> database is 200 million, but the cluster as a whole is 2 billion?
>
> There were no crashes, so no, I don't think so.

Backing up a step, do we think that the fact that this was running in
a shell rather than a screen is relevant somehow?  Or did something
happen to this particular cluster totally unrelated to that?

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Jeff Janes
Date:
Subject: Re: Cluster "stuck" in "not accepting commands to avoid wraparound data loss"
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Patch: fix lock contention for HASHHDR.mutex