Re: [HACKERS] Surjective functional indexes - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Surjective functional indexes
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoYtRb2R_H8gzmyCSbkgWdCFbUJdvpmpFQiFxj9Dr1Pc9g@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Surjective functional indexes  (Konstantin Knizhnik <k.knizhnik@postgrespro.ru>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 12:32 PM, Konstantin Knizhnik
<k.knizhnik@postgrespro.ru> wrote:
> I can not believe that there can be more than thousand non-temporary
> relations in any database.

I ran across a cluster with more than 5 million non-temporary
relations just this week.  That's extreme, but having more than a
thousand non-temporary tables is not particularly uncommon.  I would
guess that the percentage of EnterpriseDB's customers who have more
than a thousand non-temporary tables in a database is in the double
digits.  That number is only going to go up as our partitioning
capabilities improve.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alexander Kuzmenkov
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Proposal for CSN based snapshots
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: pgbench's expression parsing & negative numbers