On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 2:02 PM, Phil Sorber <phil@omniti.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 1:33 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
>>> I'm wondering if we oughta just return NULL and be done with it.
>>
>> +1. There are multiple precedents for that sort of response, which we
>> introduced exactly so that "SELECT some_function(oid) FROM some_catalog"
>> wouldn't fail just because one of the rows had gotten deleted by the
>> time the scan got to it. I don't think it's necessary for the
>> relation-size functions to be any smarter. Indeed, I'd assumed that's
>> all that Phil's patch did, since I'd not looked closer till just now.
>
> Here it is without the checking for recently dead. If it can't open
> the relation it simply returns NULL.
I think we probably ought to make pg_database_size() and
pg_tablespace_size() behave similarly.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
