Re: unite recovery.conf and postgresql.conf - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: unite recovery.conf and postgresql.conf
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoYsSf14XxKOfLGNd7mJNWH74cRJ1kt=nWnTDKNgOZ487g@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: unite recovery.conf and postgresql.conf  (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>)
Responses Re: unite recovery.conf and postgresql.conf
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 1:08 PM, Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> wrote:
> On 9/21/11 10:07 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 1:03 PM, Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> wrote:
>>>> Yeah, I get it.  But I think standby would confuse them, too, just in
>>>> a different set of situations.
>>>
>>> Other than PITR, what situations?
>>
>> Hot backup?
>
> Hot backup == PITR.   You're just not bothering to accumulate WAL logs.

Well, I don't think of it that way, but YMMV, of course.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [PERFORM] Constraint exclusion on UNION ALL subqueries with WHERE conditions
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: sequence locking