On Thu, May 11, 2023 at 1:46 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> > What I'm inclined to do about it is just revert this particular
> > change. But I'd better run around and see where else I did that,
> > because the idea is evidently not ready for prime time.
>
> Looks like that was the only such change in 2489d76c4 or
> follow-ons, so done, with a test case based on your example.
Thanks, Tom!
--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com