Re: Corruption during WAL replay - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: Corruption during WAL replay
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoYqgB8NjTgw6pZsA-RVo4qF8i9CPfqK07sjs6DLGCDf6Q@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Corruption during WAL replay  (Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Corruption during WAL replay  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Re: Corruption during WAL replay  (Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Mar 17, 2022 at 9:21 PM Kyotaro Horiguchi
<horikyota.ntt@gmail.com> wrote:
> Finally, no two of from 10 to 14 doesn't accept the same patch.
>
> As a cross-version check, I compared all combinations of the patches
> for two adjacent versions and confirmed that no hunks are lost.
>
> All versions pass check world.

Thanks, committed.

-- 
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Geoghegan
Date:
Subject: Re: Removing more vacuumlazy.c special cases, relfrozenxid optimizations
Next
From: David Rowley
Date:
Subject: Re: ExecRTCheckPerms() and many prunable partitions