On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 2:00 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
>> On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 6:25 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>>> I suspect there are still ways to shoot yourself in the foot with a
>>> broken event trigger, but it's not quite as trivial as I thought.
>
>> I'm smart enough not to doubt you, but I'd sure appreciate a hint as
>> to what you're worried about before we start building more on top of
>> it. I don't want to sink a lot of work into follow-on commits and
>> then discover during beta we have to rip it all out or disable it. It
>> seems to me that if you can always drop an event trigger without
>> interference from the event trigger system, you should at least be
>> able to shut it off if you don't like what it's doing.
>
> I doubt that not firing on DROP EVENT TRIGGER, per se, will be
> sufficient to guarantee that you can execute such a drop. Even
> if that's true in the current state of the code, we're already
> hearing requests for event triggers on lower-level events, eg
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2012-12/msg00314.php
Yep, true.
> Sooner or later there will be one somewhere in the code path involved
> in doing a heap_delete on pg_event_trigger, or one of the subsidiary
> catalogs such as pg_depend, or maybe one that just manages to fire
> someplace during backend startup, or who knows what.
Yeah. :-(
> Hence, I want a kill switch for all event triggers that will most
> certainly work, and the just-committed patch provides one.
I'm definitely not disputing the need for that patch.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
