Re: [HACKERS] Preliminary results for proposed new pgindent implementation - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Preliminary results for proposed new pgindent implementation
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoYpC+3cQeaD_tSd63RuvYoNtPVDo18V02g6PeUa+d1FDA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Preliminary results for proposed new pgindent implementation  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Preliminary results for proposed new pgindent implementation  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 10:51 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> So I'm back to the position that we ought to stick the indent
> code under src/tools/ in our main repo.  Is anyone really
> seriously against that?

Is it under the same license as everything else?

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Decimal64 and Decimal128
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Preliminary results for proposed new pgindent implementation