Re: [HACKERS] Instability in select_parallel regression test - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Instability in select_parallel regression test
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoYoq11jv4j777J_+7Y7AVyuvw+KvqrDejj+iBPejOW7Aw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Instability in select_parallel regression test  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 8:07 AM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
>> My guess is that if we apply the fix I suggested above, it'll be good
>> enough.  If that turns out not to be true, then I guess we'll have to
>> deal with that, but why not do the easy thing first?
>
> Okay, that is also a sensible approach.  Your patch looks good to me,
> though I have not tested it.

Committed.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Amit Langote
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] error detail when partition not found
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] PATCH: pageinspect / add page_checksum and bt_page_items(bytea)