Re: Remove vacuum_defer_cleanup_age - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: Remove vacuum_defer_cleanup_age
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoYo9j19j7_41LapN4vKQ1i4EHYYucHO3zJWskEL2Tv0TQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Remove vacuum_defer_cleanup_age  (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Sun, Oct 9, 2016 at 9:51 PM, Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> wrote:
> Given that hot_standby_feedback is pretty bulletproof now, and a lot of
> the work in reducing replay conflicts, I think the utility of
> vacuum_defer_cleanup_age is at an end.  I really meant so submit a patch
> to remove it to 9.6, but it got away from me.
>
> Any objections to removing the option in 10?

I'm not sure I see the point.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Rename max_parallel_degree?
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: another typo in parallel.sgml